Author Topic: Morocco 4 fulus?  (Read 142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jkk

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Morocco 4 fulus?
« on: June 16, 2019, 07:11:16 PM »
7.02g, 28.4mm. The original labeler considered it an unlisted (in Krause, anyway) type of Moroccan 3 fulus coin. I believe the weight is more consistent with a 4 fulus (modern coining authorities are not helping me by making the plural of 'fils' into either 'fulus' or 'filsa' for reasons arcane to me). I was perplexed even how to orient the obverse. There seems to be Arabic script (a zarb perhaps?), with a date on bottom...but ?821? Unless we are to imagine this coin from the early 1500s or so, and that they would back then have chosen to use the western version of Arabic numerals, that would be a very weird way to write 1821. Or we flip it, being consistent with all the actual 1800s Moroccan copper by using AH date (128?, perhaps 1284)--but then we have the Arabic script upside down. In the end, I decided in favor of the script I recognized over a date which theoretically could go either way. Any ID wisdom would be appreciated.

« Last Edit: June 16, 2019, 07:46:57 PM by jkk »
Jonathan

Offline jkk

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Re: Morocco 4 fulus?
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2019, 12:12:27 AM »
Well, seems it's a perplexer to others also. That at least makes me feel a little less clueless! :)
Jonathan

Offline Figleaf

  • Administrator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29 286
Re: Morocco 4 fulus?
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2019, 09:54:45 AM »
I think this is a contemporary forgery of Morocco Craig 166.2. See note in KM below the catalogue number.

Peter
An unidentified coin is a piece of metal. An identified coin is a piece of history.

Offline jkk

  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
Re: Morocco 4 fulus?
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2019, 04:41:11 PM »
I reckon you're right, Peter. It's the only explanation that begins to make sense.
Jonathan