News:

Sign up for the monthly zoom events by sending a PM with your email address to Hitesh

Main Menu

Bengal Presidency, Murshidabad Rupee

Started by asm, July 08, 2009, 09:49:50 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

asm

The coin below appears to be an issue of Murshidabad mint (Bengal Presidency) However it looks quite different from the coin in the Standard Catalogue. Please help. AH 1187 RY 12 of Shah Alam II is what I can read.
Amit
"It Is Better To Light A Candle Than To Curse The Darkness"

Figleaf

The right picture seems like Mughal empire KM 660 to me, while the left could very well be Bengal presidency KM 84.2. Yet, a mule is excluded, as it wouldn't explain the regnal year 12. Mysterious.

Peter
An unidentified coin is a piece of metal. An identified coin is a piece of history.

Oesho

It's just a variety. The cinqefoil symbol differs somewhat of the usual pieces.

asm

Oesho & Peter, thank you for the confirmation. I was also confused due to the absence of the circle made of 5 dots between the date and the cinqefoil on the rev.
Amit
"It Is Better To Light A Candle Than To Curse The Darkness"

Rangnath

I wonder how many cinqefoil symbols there are?  This one looks quite unusual to me. Another lovely coin Amit.
richie

Rangnath


abhinumis

Thought of this old thread while going through a catalogue.. Rajgor says the coin is of French India!! Have a look at the link.. Do comment.
http://www.rajgors.com/LotDetails.aspx?LotID=155&auid=1
Dr.Abhishek

Figleaf

No doubt it's the same coin. Does this identification match the major catalogues?

Peter
An unidentified coin is a piece of metal. An identified coin is a piece of history.

asm

I tend to agree with what you point out. If Mr Ragjor is correct in his reading : Murshidabad Mint, Silver, Rupee, in the name of Shah Alam II, crescent on obv, AH 1187/12 (KM 30). Chandernagar issued coins for the French for a short period of time. These issues are distinguished by a Daroga's mark in the form of a dot below the Jasmine flower on rev. on the right of RY. this coin would well be French India. Oesho too seems to concur.......
Quote from: Oesho on July 12, 2009, 01:23:55 AM
It's just a variety. The cinqefoil symbol differs somewhat of the usual pieces.
.
"It Is Better To Light A Candle Than To Curse The Darkness"

abhinumis

So this coin is a french india issue with RY 12 while this coin posted by me http://www.worldofcoins.eu/forum/index.php/topic,18766.0.html  would be a bengal presidency issue with RY 12 both from murshidabad mint..Interesting!! That means murshidabad mint was minting coins both for the british and the french almost at the same time! 
Dr.Abhishek

asm

Quote from: abhinumis on December 01, 2012, 05:27:41 PM
So this coin is a french india issue with RY 12 while this coin posted by me http://www.worldofcoins.eu/forum/index.php/topic,18766.0.html  would be a bengal presidency issue with RY 12 both from murshidabad mint..Interesting!! That means murshidabad mint was minting coins both for the british and the french almost at the same time!
If you read Ragjors details, the coin was minted at Chandernagar.........so minted at Chandernagar with the mint name Murshidabad.

Amit
"It Is Better To Light A Candle Than To Curse The Darkness"

Oesho

Recently Dr. Paul Stevens published 'The Coinage of the Hon. East India Company: Part I, The Coins of the Bengal Presidency'. This book explores the coins and mints of the Bengal Presidency from 1757, when the B.E.I.C. first acquired the right to mint coins there, until 1835m when a uniform coinage was introduced into British India. In essence this book builds upon and expands the well-known work originally produced by Major Fred Pridmore.
A paperback edition has also been produced for the Indian market, distributed by FS Todywalla.

From Stevens, p.96: "Coins of the years 11 & 12 were issued by the B.E.I.C. from all four mints, Calcutta, Murshidabad, Patna, and Dacca. There may be a secret dot system to distinguish the coins from the different mints, but this is rather speculative at present."
Stevens suggests that the rupee with the plain flower (as is the one above) may have been struck at either Patna or Dacca. I (Oesho) have a personal preference for Dacca, but as Stevens writes, it is still speculative.

Any French mintage in the Bengal Presidency, during this period or earlier, should be entirely ruled out!!

The British were the first to obtain the privilege to mint in the Bengal Presidency. The other European Trading Companies had to bring, under more or less favorable conditions, their bullion to the mint to be coined into sicca rupees.

asm

Thank you Oesho for the information. I had picked up this coin in Dhaka.........

Amit
"It Is Better To Light A Candle Than To Curse The Darkness"

Oesho

QuoteI had picked up this coin in Dhaka.........
In a way this confirms my idea about its mint of origin.