Author Topic: Ghosting  (Read 1821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline <k>

  • Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15 983
Ghosting
« on: October 02, 2015, 01:29:50 AM »


Mauritius, 200 rupees, 1971.  Independence commemorative.

The reverse design illustrates the novel Paul et Virginie by the French author Jacques-Henri Bernardin de Saint-Pierre.

 
« Last Edit: October 03, 2015, 12:17:15 AM by <k> »

Offline constanius

  • Meritorious Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 727
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2015, 07:05:12 PM »
In the obverse field it seems as if you can make out some of the reverse design.

Pat
« Last Edit: October 02, 2015, 07:19:36 PM by constanius »

Pat

Offline <k>

  • Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15 983
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2015, 07:13:33 PM »
Can't see it, myself. Do you see ghosts in real life?  ;)

Offline constanius

  • Meritorious Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 727
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2015, 07:32:44 PM »
You cannot see anything in what should be the plain field on the obverse?

As if the metal has been drawn into the reverse design, "I.M.D.P" -( Internal Metal Displacement Phenomenon )

I have seen ghost imaging on coins, not ghosts. :)

http://www.worldofcoins.eu/forum/index.php?topic=8334.0   




Pat
« Last Edit: October 02, 2015, 08:36:38 PM by constanius »

Pat

Offline constanius

  • Meritorious Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 727
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2015, 10:34:41 PM »


Horizontally flipped reverse & layered at 20% over obverse.

Pat

Pat

Offline constanius

  • Meritorious Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 727
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2015, 09:24:00 PM »
Noticed you are using a different image in the original topic before this "split" does that mean that you can now see the "ghosting", as you have made no comment. 

This comparison shows the difference in jaw line on QEII caused by, most probably, "I.M.D.P" the only other causes that I can think of would be actual die distortion, underweight planchet(there being not enough metal for a good strike), die clash, or, less likely, adjustment of the die strike being wrongly set.



Whatever the cause this is a very rare phenomenon and I admit that I was expecting a reply as the purpose of these forums is to share & expand our knowledge. 

Pat

Pat

Offline <k>

  • Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15 983
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2015, 10:30:55 PM »
Noticed you are using a different image in the original topic before this "split" does that mean that you can now see the "ghosting", as you have made no comment. 

I split the topic for two reasons: I felt that the "ghosting" issue was detracting from the purpose of my design topic; however, I recognised that the ghosting really deserved a topic of its own. I made no comment, since physical aspects such as this do not interest me and I have no intuitive understanding of them, therefore I had nothing to add, though I expected others would. Over to the members, now!  :)

Offline FosseWay

  • Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2 724
  • Göteborg, Sverige
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2015, 09:56:49 PM »
I learnt about ghosting in connection with George V coppers from the UK. The first series (1911-26), especially the penny, show precisely the phenomenon Constanius points out above. The various changes to the portrait in the mid- to late 1920s were intended to deal with the problem.

On the Mauritius coin at the start of this topic, is it just me or is there something distinctly odd about the kerning of the text on the obverse? The letters of QUEEN are to my eyes at least much closer together than those of SECOND, while the date is even more widely spaced. I can kind of accept that the date might be deliberately different but the lack of uniformity across the rest of the inscription makes the coin look unbalanced.

Offline <k>

  • Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15 983
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #8 on: October 07, 2015, 12:27:05 AM »
The letters of QUEEN are to my eyes at least much closer together than those of SECOND, while the date is even more widely spaced.

I agree with your perception, though it's not something I would have noticed without being prompted. The E and L in ELIZABETH are even closer together. Christopher Ironside would have modelled the lettering by hand, back in those days.

Offline mrbadexample

  • Meritorious Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Ghosting
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2016, 01:56:38 PM »
I learnt about ghosting in connection with George V coppers from the UK. The first series (1911-26), especially the penny, show precisely the phenomenon Constanius points out above. The various changes to the portrait in the mid- to late 1920s were intended to deal with the problem.

Example of such: