Siege of Newark~6 Pence 1646

Started by Zantetsuken, June 22, 2014, 12:16:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zantetsuken

Emergency coins issued during the 'English Civil War' (1642-1651) for Newark-on-Trent. During the final siege of Newark, which began in 1645, regiments loyal to King Charles I gathered silver plates  from wealthy families and the Castle, in order to make coins in numerous denominations dated 1645 and 1646. The following is a 6 Pence dated 1646, the final year of the siege.


NEWARK (SIEGE)~6 Pence 1646

Figleaf

This is an exiting series, but so hard to collect. Always happy to see one.

Are you changing your collecting interest, or is there some relation with medieval Balkan coins?

Peter
An unidentified coin is a piece of metal. An identified coin is a piece of history.

capnbirdseye

Wonderful coin! I suppose they made them roughly square as it easier to chop the metal from plate in straight lines
Vic

malj1

#3
One of the best I have seen.

As you say easiest to cut square but they also would have had to consider the value of the silver and cut to an approximate size to equal this.

I once visited Newark [after the seige]
Malcolm
Have a look at  my tokens and my banknotes.

Zantetsuken

Quote from: Figleaf on June 22, 2014, 06:51:36 PM
This is an exiting series, but so hard to collect. Always happy to see one.

Are you changing your collecting interest, or is there some relation with medieval Balkan coins?

Peter

Thanks Pete. No, I still mainly collect Russia and eastern Europe. However, I like to mix things up now and again. This was interesting coin from a very important point in England's history. I love the unique shape of these coins and the story behind them.

@ capnbirdseye~ That's what the seller told me. They cut them in rhombic shape because it was easier than trimming them in circular form. It makes sense, especially the crude circumstances under which these were minted.

This one had been pierced at one point, then later repaired. It looks to have been professionally done since the details were recreated in the section where the hole was punched with nice precision. Still, it was the price I payed for this beauty.

capnbirdseye

Quote from: Zantetsuken on June 23, 2014, 04:37:16 AM

This one had been pierced at one point, then later repaired. It looks to have been professionally done since the details were recreated in the section where the hole was punched with nice precision. Still, it was the price I payed for this beauty.

A very good repair, I think I see a square plug below the 4 of the date? if pierced to hang on a cord or chain then it would have hung upside
Vic

FosseWay

Pure guesswork, but I note the piercing obliterates the mark of value on the other side. Could it have been intentional to "demonetise" the piece after the siege, or after the ultimate victory of Parliament?

As capnbirdseye notes, if you thread a string through the hole the coin would hang upside down, and to obliterate a design element like that on a coin with relatively little design to start with seems odd if you're wanting to display it as an aesthetic object.