Author Topic: 1 Sen of Japan (1874), Meiji Year 7  (Read 2383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Numii_Anglii

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
1 Sen of Japan (1874), Meiji Year 7
« on: October 30, 2010, 12:04:56 PM »
1 Sen of Japan (1874), Meiji Year 7. Grade? VF/XF?? Traces of lustre..

Another beautiful example of Japanese numismatic art  8) Please comment, rate, grade etc!...



« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 12:56:45 PM by Numii_Anglii »

Offline andyg

  • Global Moderator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3 731
  • DERBYS ยท UK
Re: 1 Sen of Japan (1873), Meiji Year 6.
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2010, 12:14:22 PM »
1 Sen of Japan (1873), Meiji Year 6. Grade? VF/XF?? Traces of lustre..

Another beautiful example of Japanese numismatic art  8) Please comment, rate, grade etc!...

This one is 1874....
always willing to trade modern UK coins for modern coins from elsewhere....

translateltd

  • Guest
Re: 1 Sen of Japan (1874), Meiji Year 7
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2010, 08:19:37 PM »
You mentioned not being able to make out some of the text.  The characters at the top of the "denomination" side read "ONE HUNDRED PIECES MAKE ONE YEN" in Classical Japanese.  Japan had just adopted decimal currency a few years earlier so this was probably intended as a handy guide.  I believe only the 1 and 2-sen coins carried such inscriptions, though - nothing on the silver coins or the bronze 1-rin (1/1000 yen).


Offline Figleaf

  • Administrator
  • Honorary Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31 362
Re: 1 Sen of Japan (1874), Meiji Year 7
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2010, 09:01:07 PM »
Even after a prolonged stare, I couldn't figure out the dragon. Too many ends. Yes, I know it's a classical design and people liked it because they were familiar with it, but two of the legs seem only connected to each other...

I like these enlargements for bringing out detail. Maybe some experimenting with colour correction would yield even better results, though.

There are some Dutch coins with similar notes, 100 c. on the Gulden and 250 c. on the rijksdaalder. A good reminder of how even a drastic simplification must be explained to be accepted.

Peter
« Last Edit: October 30, 2010, 09:08:45 PM by Figleaf »
An unidentified coin is a piece of metal. An identified coin is a piece of history.